Best Hosting Providers in Russian Federation
Performance comparison of 37 hosting providers based in Russian Federation.
Russian Federation Hosting Rankings
| # | Company | Score | 1MB | TTFB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 476 | 101 ms | 988 ms | |
| 2 | 657 | 106 ms | 326 ms | |
| 3 | 867 | 129 ms | 502 ms | |
| 4 | 964 | 209 ms | 675 ms | |
| 5 | 1033 | 142 ms | 844 ms | |
| 6 | 1056 | 201 ms | 847 ms | |
| 7 | 1140 | 124 ms | 722 ms | |
| 8 | 1154 | 297 ms | 314 ms | |
| 9 | 1206 | 97 ms | 895 ms | |
| 10 | 1249 | 354 ms | 241 ms | |
| 11 | 1300 | 310 ms | 731 ms | |
| 12 | 1333 | 427 ms | 862 ms | |
| 13 | 1376 | 232 ms | 1119 ms | |
| 14 | 1413 | 149 ms | 480 ms | |
| 15 | 1489 | 335 ms | 645 ms | |
| 16 | 1520 | 427 ms | 357 ms | |
| 17 | 1554 | 220 ms | 284 ms | |
| 18 | 1584 | 449 ms | 738 ms | |
| 19 | 1594 | 403 ms | 672 ms | |
| 20 | 1679 | 497 ms | 426 ms | |
| 21 | 1715 | 501 ms | 663 ms | |
| 22 | 1768 | 579 ms | 735 ms | |
| 23 | 1845 | 535 ms | 469 ms | |
| 24 | 1962 | 535 ms | 253 ms | |
| 25 | 1994 | 282 ms | 2165 ms | |
| 26 | 2023 | 513 ms | 546 ms | |
| 27 | 2105 | 354 ms | 1255 ms | |
| 28 | 2118 | 653 ms | 516 ms | |
| 29 | 2350 | 723 ms | 929 ms | |
| 30 | 2451 | 629 ms | 256 ms | |
| 31 | 2570 | 839 ms | 324 ms | |
| 32 | 3034 | 149 ms | 1687 ms | |
| 33 | 3290 | 1058 ms | 590 ms | |
| 34 | 3453 | 986 ms | 1202 ms | |
| 35 | 9069 | 3499 ms | 570 ms | |
| 36 | 9236 | 3679 ms | 256 ms | |
| 37 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Russian Hosting Infrastructure: Technical Assessment
Russia's hosting market operates within unique constraints, yet houses significant technical capability. Moscow and St. Petersburg serve as primary data center hubs, with domestic providers serving the world's largest country by area.
Measurement Methodology
Our automated testing framework applies identical benchmarks to all Russian providers, measuring server responsiveness and data transfer capabilities. The Wptr Score provides objective performance comparison.
The Russian Hosting Environment
Established providers like REG.RU, Beget, and TimeWeb dominate the market. Russian hosting law requires certain data categories to be stored domestically, creating a distinct ecosystem with limited international integration.
Technical Infrastructure
Moscow's MSK-IX provides substantial domestic peering. International connectivity has faced restrictions, affecting latency to European destinations. Russian servers remain essential for properly serving Russian-speaking audiences.
Objective Analysis
Our rankings reflect technical measurement only, providing clarity in a market where independent analysis is valuable.