Las Mejores Empresas de Hosting del Mundo
Compara más de 100 proveedores de hosting clasificados por rendimiento real. Pruebas de velocidad TTFB independientes, monitorización de actividad y opiniones expertas para encontrar tu host web ideal en 2026.
| # | Company | Puntaje Wptr Lab | Time to 1MB | TTFB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 250 | 97 ms | 17 ms | |
2 | 294 | 101 ms | 52 ms | |
3 | 297 | 104 ms | 47 ms | |
4 | 303 | 97 ms | 70 ms | |
5 | 307 | 111 ms | 41 ms | |
6 | 313 | 105 ms | 61 ms | |
7 | 316 | 108 ms | 57 ms | |
8 | 338 | 122 ms | 45 ms | |
9 | 347 | 117 ms | 66 ms | |
10 | 353 | 124 ms | 55 ms | |
11 | 353 | 107 ms | 96 ms | |
12 | 354 | 111 ms | 88 ms | |
13 | 366 | 106 ms | 112 ms | |
14 | 373 | 111 ms | 107 ms | |
15 | 377 | 117 ms | 96 ms | |
16 | 377 | 103 ms | 130 ms | |
17 | 388 | 103 ms | 141 ms | |
18 | 390 | 130 ms | 78 ms | |
19 | 390 | 116 ms | 112 ms | |
20 | 396 | 128 ms | 89 ms | |
21 | 402 | 97 ms | 169 ms | |
22 | 411 | 126 ms | 109 ms | |
23 | 413 | 140 ms | 77 ms | |
24 | 421 | 114 ms | 147 ms | |
25 | 421 | 121 ms | 131 ms | |
26 | 434 | 110 ms | 170 ms | |
27 | 441 | 121 ms | 151 ms | |
28 | 442 | 125 ms | 142 ms | |
29 | 443 | 154 ms | 73 ms | |
30 | 443 | 125 ms | 143 ms | |
31 | 449 | 136 ms | 123 ms | |
32 | 450 | 114 ms | 176 ms | |
33 | 450 | 106 ms | 196 ms | |
34 | 458 | 103 ms | 211 ms | |
35 | 462 | 158 ms | 83 ms | |
36 | 462 | 118 ms | 179 ms | |
37 | 465 | 172 ms | 52 ms | |
38 | 470 | 139 ms | 136 ms | |
39 | 475 | 104 ms | 225 ms | |
40 | 476 | 147 ms | 123 ms | |
41 | 480 | 103 ms | 233 ms | |
42 | 483 | 122 ms | 190 ms | |
43 | 483 | 126 ms | 181 ms | |
44 | 485 | 95 ms | 257 ms | |
45 | 486 | 114 ms | 212 ms | |
46 | 488 | 135 ms | 164 ms | |
47 | 493 | 138 ms | 162 ms | |
48 | 495 | 106 ms | 241 ms | |
49 | 496 | 102 ms | 251 ms | |
50 | 496 | 107 ms | 239 ms | |
51 | 496 | 140 ms | 160 ms | |
52 | 498 | 167 ms | 97 ms | |
53 | 500 | 154 ms | 130 ms | |
54 | 507 | 139 ms | 173 ms | |
55 | 517 | 131 ms | 203 ms | |
56 | 524 | 127 ms | 219 ms | |
57 | 525 | 160 ms | 141 ms | |
58 | 528 | 99 ms | 290 ms | |
59 | 529 | 107 ms | 272 ms | |
60 | 530 | 112 ms | 261 ms | |
61 | 532 | 124 ms | 234 ms | |
62 | 532 | 161 ms | 146 ms | |
63 | 534 | 137 ms | 205 ms | |
64 | 534 | 100 ms | 294 ms | |
65 | 537 | 112 ms | 268 ms | |
66 | 540 | 109 ms | 278 ms | |
67 | 540 | 136 ms | 214 ms | |
68 | 545 | 113 ms | 274 ms | |
69 | 554 | 111 ms | 288 ms | |
70 | 555 | 156 ms | 181 ms | |
71 | 559 | 127 ms | 254 ms | |
72 | 562 | 184 ms | 120 ms | |
73 | 564 | 149 ms | 206 ms | |
74 | 564 | 155 ms | 192 ms | |
75 | 565 | 125 ms | 265 ms | |
76 | 569 | 107 ms | 312 ms | |
77 | 572 | 156 ms | 198 ms | |
78 | 576 | 187 ms | 127 ms | |
79 | 580 | 114 ms | 306 ms | |
80 | 583 | 133 ms | 264 ms | |
81 | 584 | 119 ms | 298 ms | |
82 | 586 | 121 ms | 296 ms | |
83 | 587 | 118 ms | 304 ms | |
84 | 590 | 136 ms | 264 ms | |
85 | 591 | 131 ms | 277 ms | |
86 | 596 | 141 ms | 258 ms | |
87 | 598 | 146 ms | 248 ms | |
88 | 605 | 189 ms | 151 ms | |
89 | 613 | 147 ms | 260 ms | |
90 | 615 | 190 ms | 159 ms | |
91 | 617 | 137 ms | 288 ms | |
92 | 624 | 117 ms | 343 ms | |
93 | 626 | 104 ms | 376 ms | |
94 | 628 | 194 ms | 162 ms | |
95 | 629 | 105 ms | 377 ms | |
96 | 630 | 152 ms | 265 ms | |
97 | 634 | 182 ms | 197 ms | |
98 | 634 | 125 ms | 334 ms | |
99 | 639 | 190 ms | 183 ms | |
100 | 642 | 234 ms | 80 ms |
Detailed Hosting Performance Analysis
Bunny.netScore: 250/100
Rank #1 - WPTR Score: 250ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, Bunny.net demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 120 spots to reach rank #1, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 250ms (1MB: 97ms, TTFB: 17ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
HostingerScore: 294/100
Rank #2 - WPTR Score: 294ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, Hostinger demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 7 spots to reach rank #2, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 294ms (1MB: 101ms, TTFB: 52ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
WimiScore: 297/100
Rank #3 - WPTR Score: 297ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, Wimi demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 92 spots to reach rank #3, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 297ms (1MB: 104ms, TTFB: 47ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
Network SolutionsScore: 303/100
Rank #4 - WPTR Score: 303ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, Network Solutions demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 50 spots to reach rank #4, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 303ms (1MB: 97ms, TTFB: 70ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
Name.comScore: 307/100
Rank #5 - WPTR Score: 307ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, Name.com demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 9 spots to reach rank #5, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 307ms (1MB: 111ms, TTFB: 41ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
ContaboScore: 313/100
Rank #6 - WPTR Score: 313ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, Contabo demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 64 spots to reach rank #6, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 313ms (1MB: 105ms, TTFB: 61ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
ShopifyScore: 316/100
Rank #7 - WPTR Score: 316ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, Shopify demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, maintaining its solid position at #7. With an WPTR Score of 316ms (1MB: 108ms, TTFB: 57ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
BigScootsScore: 338/100
Rank #8 - WPTR Score: 338ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, BigScoots demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 9 spots to reach rank #8, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 338ms (1MB: 122ms, TTFB: 45ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
RoseHostingScore: 347/100
Rank #9 - WPTR Score: 347ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, RoseHosting demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 36 spots to reach rank #9, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 347ms (1MB: 117ms, TTFB: 66ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
DigitalOceanScore: 353/100
Rank #10 - WPTR Score: 353ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 2/27/2026, DigitalOcean demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, slipping 5 spots to rank #10 in this testing cycle. With an WPTR Score of 353ms (1MB: 124ms, TTFB: 55ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
¿Por Qué Confiar en Esta Clasificación?
La mayoría de los sitios de reseñas se basan en opiniones subjetivas. Wptr Lab se basa en las Leyes de la Física. El Puntaje de Carga Real Wptr Lab simula el tiempo que tarda un sitio web promedio (2.4 MB) en ser transferido del servidor al navegador.
Nuestra Fórmula: puntaje = TTFB + (Tiempo para 1MB * 2.4)
Este puntaje es la única métrica global que aisla la calidad pura del hardware y la red del servidor, eliminando variables de software.
Hosting por País
Explora proveedores de hosting según su ubicación. Encuentra las mejores soluciones de hosting local en tu región.
Filtrar por Stack Tecnológico
Si un proveedor de hosting utiliza Next.js en su propio sitio web, es un indicador suficiente de experiencia para listarlo en la categoría "Next.js Hosting". Investigaciones académicas demuestran que el uso interno de una tecnología (dogfooding) refleja competencia técnica.
Archivo y Registro de Transparencia
De acuerdo con nuestros principios de transparencia, mantenemos un registro público permanente de todos los resultados de pruebas anteriores. Acceda a los informes detallados a continuación.
Comparar Inteligencia de Hosting
Profundiza en las métricas de rendimiento bruto. Selecciona dos proveedores y analiza TTFB, puntuaciones de velocidad y stacks tecnológicos lado a lado.
Iniciar Comparación