Best Hosting Providers in Russian Federation
Performance comparison of 37 hosting providers based in Russian Federation.
Russian Federation Hosting Rankings
| # | Company | Score | 1MB | TTFB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 651 | 241 ms | 73 ms | |
| 2 | 656 | 133 ms | 337 ms | |
| 3 | 761 | 122 ms | 468 ms | |
| 4 | 826 | 131 ms | 512 ms | |
| 5 | 888 | 241 ms | 310 ms | |
| 6 | 891 | 241 ms | 313 ms | |
| 7 | 895 | 241 ms | 317 ms | |
| 8 | 924 | 147 ms | 571 ms | |
| 9 | 985 | 155 ms | 613 ms | |
| 10 | 993 | 150 ms | 633 ms | |
| 11 | 1027 | 102 ms | 782 ms | |
| 12 | 1056 | 235 ms | 492 ms | |
| 13 | 1112 | 191 ms | 654 ms | |
| 14 | 1173 | 306 ms | 439 ms | |
| 15 | 1176 | 109 ms | 914 ms | |
| 16 | 1264 | 135 ms | 940 ms | |
| 17 | 1366 | 196 ms | 896 ms | |
| 18 | 1389 | 111 ms | 1123 ms | |
| 19 | 1432 | 184 ms | 990 ms | |
| 20 | 1437 | 141 ms | 1099 ms | |
| 21 | 1522 | 163 ms | 1131 ms | |
| 22 | 1586 | 161 ms | 1200 ms | |
| 23 | 1642 | 445 ms | 574 ms | |
| 24 | 1692 | 505 ms | 480 ms | |
| 25 | 1833 | 527 ms | 568 ms | |
| 26 | 1849 | 521 ms | 599 ms | |
| 27 | 1933 | 207 ms | 1436 ms | |
| 28 | 2013 | 533 ms | 734 ms | |
| 29 | 2170 | 799 ms | 252 ms | |
| 30 | 2179 | 480 ms | 1027 ms | |
| 31 | 2317 | 120 ms | 2029 ms | |
| 32 | 2567 | 627 ms | 1062 ms | |
| 33 | 2978 | 507 ms | 1761 ms | |
| 34 | 3127 | 607 ms | 1670 ms | |
| 35 | 3239 | 813 ms | 1288 ms | |
| 36 | 6569 | 2505 ms | 557 ms | |
| 37 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Russian Hosting Infrastructure: Technical Assessment
Russia's hosting market operates within unique constraints, yet houses significant technical capability. Moscow and St. Petersburg serve as primary data center hubs, with domestic providers serving the world's largest country by area.
Measurement Methodology
Our automated testing framework applies identical benchmarks to all Russian providers, measuring server responsiveness and data transfer capabilities. The Wptr Score provides objective performance comparison.
The Russian Hosting Environment
Established providers like REG.RU, Beget, and TimeWeb dominate the market. Russian hosting law requires certain data categories to be stored domestically, creating a distinct ecosystem with limited international integration.
Technical Infrastructure
Moscow's MSK-IX provides substantial domestic peering. International connectivity has faced restrictions, affecting latency to European destinations. Russian servers remain essential for properly serving Russian-speaking audiences.
Objective Analysis
Our rankings reflect technical measurement only, providing clarity in a market where independent analysis is valuable.