World's Best Hosting Companies
Compare 100+ hosting providers ranked by real performance data. Independent TTFB speed tests, uptime monitoring & expert reviews to find your perfect web host in 2026.
| # | Company | Wptr Lab Score | Time to 1MB | TTFB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 257 | 98 ms | 22 ms | |
2 | 285 | 107 ms | 28 ms | |
3 | 301 | 101 ms | 59 ms | |
4 | 310 | 104 ms | 60 ms | |
5 | 314 | 101 ms | 72 ms | |
6 | 320 | 116 ms | 42 ms | |
7 | 325 | 116 ms | 47 ms | |
8 | 327 | 120 ms | 39 ms | |
9 | 348 | 108 ms | 89 ms | |
10 | 354 | 107 ms | 97 ms | |
11 | 360 | 96 ms | 130 ms | |
12 | 362 | 107 ms | 105 ms | |
13 | 364 | 114 ms | 90 ms | |
14 | 368 | 110 ms | 104 ms | |
15 | 370 | 120 ms | 82 ms | |
16 | 372 | 112 ms | 103 ms | |
17 | 374 | 107 ms | 117 ms | |
18 | 377 | 117 ms | 96 ms | |
19 | 377 | 98 ms | 142 ms | |
20 | 377 | 118 ms | 94 ms | |
21 | 379 | 106 ms | 125 ms | |
22 | 383 | 130 ms | 71 ms | |
23 | 383 | 125 ms | 83 ms | |
24 | 384 | 125 ms | 84 ms | |
25 | 384 | 133 ms | 65 ms | |
26 | 386 | 118 ms | 103 ms | |
27 | 387 | 119 ms | 101 ms | |
28 | 390 | 118 ms | 107 ms | |
29 | 402 | 115 ms | 126 ms | |
30 | 403 | 100 ms | 163 ms | |
31 | 403 | 116 ms | 125 ms | |
32 | 408 | 124 ms | 110 ms | |
33 | 412 | 127 ms | 107 ms | |
34 | 424 | 126 ms | 122 ms | |
35 | 424 | 126 ms | 122 ms | |
36 | 427 | 130 ms | 115 ms | |
37 | 439 | 151 ms | 77 ms | |
38 | 441 | 125 ms | 141 ms | |
39 | 443 | 152 ms | 78 ms | |
40 | 445 | 102 ms | 200 ms | |
41 | 446 | 154 ms | 76 ms | |
42 | 449 | 118 ms | 166 ms | |
43 | 451 | 112 ms | 182 ms | |
44 | 460 | 114 ms | 186 ms | |
45 | 466 | 120 ms | 178 ms | |
46 | 467 | 134 ms | 145 ms | |
47 | 467 | 112 ms | 198 ms | |
48 | 477 | 112 ms | 208 ms | |
49 | 480 | 109 ms | 218 ms | |
50 | 484 | 140 ms | 148 ms | |
51 | 485 | 98 ms | 250 ms | |
52 | 486 | 108 ms | 227 ms | |
53 | 489 | 109 ms | 227 ms | |
54 | 489 | 109 ms | 227 ms | |
55 | 489 | 118 ms | 206 ms | |
56 | 489 | 101 ms | 247 ms | |
57 | 491 | 107 ms | 234 ms | |
58 | 492 | 98 ms | 257 ms | |
59 | 495 | 106 ms | 241 ms | |
60 | 496 | 152 ms | 131 ms | |
61 | 502 | 141 ms | 164 ms | |
62 | 503 | 187 ms | 54 ms | |
63 | 504 | 129 ms | 194 ms | |
64 | 505 | 141 ms | 167 ms | |
65 | 509 | 129 ms | 199 ms | |
66 | 511 | 106 ms | 257 ms | |
67 | 514 | 154 ms | 144 ms | |
68 | 514 | 121 ms | 224 ms | |
69 | 515 | 97 ms | 282 ms | |
70 | 516 | 107 ms | 259 ms | |
71 | 531 | 117 ms | 250 ms | |
72 | 531 | 102 ms | 286 ms | |
73 | 533 | 104 ms | 283 ms | |
74 | 534 | 164 ms | 140 ms | |
75 | 535 | 95 ms | 307 ms | |
76 | 538 | 123 ms | 243 ms | |
77 | 539 | 124 ms | 241 ms | |
78 | 547 | 100 ms | 307 ms | |
79 | 550 | 120 ms | 262 ms | |
80 | 550 | 135 ms | 226 ms | |
81 | 554 | 104 ms | 304 ms | |
82 | 554 | 113 ms | 283 ms | |
83 | 559 | 193 ms | 96 ms | |
84 | 560 | 129 ms | 250 ms | |
85 | 562 | 97 ms | 329 ms | |
86 | 562 | 111 ms | 296 ms | |
87 | 572 | 207 ms | 75 ms | |
88 | 572 | 110 ms | 308 ms | |
89 | 572 | 178 ms | 145 ms | |
90 | 580 | 158 ms | 201 ms | |
91 | 582 | 130 ms | 270 ms | |
92 | 582 | 128 ms | 275 ms | |
93 | 587 | 195 ms | 119 ms | |
94 | 589 | 103 ms | 342 ms | |
95 | 590 | 120 ms | 302 ms | |
96 | 593 | 104 ms | 343 ms | |
97 | 596 | 123 ms | 301 ms | |
98 | 603 | 149 ms | 245 ms | |
99 | 612 | 119 ms | 326 ms | |
100 | 612 | 111 ms | 346 ms |
Detailed Hosting Performance Analysis
Bunny.netScore: 257/100
Rank #1 - WPTR Score: 257ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, Bunny.net demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 121 spots to reach rank #1, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 257ms (1MB: 98ms, TTFB: 22ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
UOL HostScore: 285/100
Rank #2 - WPTR Score: 285ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, UOL Host demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, maintaining its solid position at #2. With an WPTR Score of 285ms (1MB: 107ms, TTFB: 28ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
HostingerScore: 301/100
Rank #3 - WPTR Score: 301ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, Hostinger demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 8 spots to reach rank #3, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 301ms (1MB: 101ms, TTFB: 59ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
ContaboScore: 310/100
Rank #4 - WPTR Score: 310ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, Contabo demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 47 spots to reach rank #4, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 310ms (1MB: 104ms, TTFB: 60ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
Network SolutionsScore: 314/100
Rank #5 - WPTR Score: 314ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, Network Solutions demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 21 spots to reach rank #5, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 314ms (1MB: 101ms, TTFB: 72ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
10WebScore: 320/100
Rank #6 - WPTR Score: 320ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, 10Web demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 17 spots to reach rank #6, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 320ms (1MB: 116ms, TTFB: 42ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
WimiScore: 325/100
Rank #7 - WPTR Score: 325ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, Wimi demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 106 spots to reach rank #7, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 325ms (1MB: 116ms, TTFB: 47ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
CloudFireScore: 327/100
Rank #8 - WPTR Score: 327ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, CloudFire demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 418 spots to reach rank #8, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 327ms (1MB: 120ms, TTFB: 39ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
Cirrus HostingScore: 348/100
Rank #9 - WPTR Score: 348ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, Cirrus Hosting demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 25 spots to reach rank #9, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 348ms (1MB: 108ms, TTFB: 89ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
Rocket.netScore: 354/100
Rank #10 - WPTR Score: 354ms
Performance Verdict: Exceptional
Based on our independent testing conducted on 3/1/2026, Rocket.net demonstrates industry-leading server throughput, climbing 5 spots to reach rank #10, showing positive momentum. With an WPTR Score of 354ms (1MB: 107ms, TTFB: 97ms), it provides an optimal foundation for data-heavy Next.js applications. This level of sustained transfer speed signifies a high-bandwidth infrastructure.
Why Should You Trust This Ranking?
Most review sites rely on personal opinions. Wptr Lab relies on the Laws of Physics. The Wptr Lab Real-Load Score we developed for you simulates the time it takes for an average website (2.4 MB) to reach the browser from the server.
Our Formula: score = TTFB + (Time To 1MB * 2.4)
This score is the only metric in the world that reveals the pure hardware and network quality of the server, stripped of software errors.
Hosting by Country
Explore hosting providers by their headquarters location. Find the best local hosting solutions in your region.
Filter by Technology Stack
If a hosting provider uses Next.js on their own website, it's a sufficient indicator of expertise to list them under "Next.js Hosting." Academic research shows that internal use of a technology (dogfooding) reflects technical competence.
Archive & Transparency Log
In accordance with our transparency principles, we maintain a permanent public record of all past test results. Access detailed reports for previous testing cycles below.
Compare Hosting Intelligence
Dive deep into raw performance metrics. Select two providers and analyze TTFB, speed scores, and technology stacks side-by-side.
Start Comparison