GitHub|Since 2007

GB123 RegvsEnhancedGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score1669 ms
Rank#502
TTFB1117ms
Time to 1MB290ms
Score1669
LCP1517ms
FCP1317ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1133 ms
Rank#192
TTFB117ms
Time to 1MB285ms
Score1133
LCP517ms
FCP317ms

Our Verdict

Enhanced wins with 117ms TTFB (vs 123 Reg's 1117ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

Phase123 RegEnhancedWinner
DNS Lookup40ms134ms123 Reg
TCP Connection54ms121ms123 Reg
TLS Handshake133ms8msEnhanced
Server Processing746ms186msEnhanced
Total TTFB973ms449msEnhanced

Technology & Security Features

123 Reg

Server/CDNenvoy
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size901.5 KB

Enhanced

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size255.9 KB
0/3
123 Reg Security Features
2/3
Enhanced Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.