123 RegvsLittlefish
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

123 Reg
View Details →
Littlefish
View Details →Our Verdict
123 Reg wins with 1117ms TTFB (vs Littlefish's 1231ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | 123 Reg | Littlefish | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 40ms | 39ms | Littlefish |
| TCP Connection | 54ms | 51ms | Littlefish |
| TLS Handshake | 133ms | 100ms | Littlefish |
| Server Processing | 746ms | 90ms | Littlefish |
| Total TTFB | 973ms | 280ms | 123 Reg |
Technology & Security Features
123 Reg
Littlefish
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.