GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GB20ivsACUTECGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

20i
WPTR ScoreWinner913 ms
Rank#237
TTFB257ms
Time to 1MB271ms
Score913
LCP657ms
FCP457ms
ACUTEC
WPTR Score1076 ms
Rank#307
TTFB491ms
Time to 1MB262ms
Score1076
LCP891ms
FCP691ms

Our Verdict

20i wins with 257ms TTFB (vs ACUTEC's 491ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

Phase20iACUTECWinner
DNS Lookup95ms141ms20i
TCP Connection83ms90ms20i
TLS Handshake43ms56ms20i
Server Processing42ms160ms20i
Total TTFB263ms447ms20i

Technology & Security Features

20i

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size556.4 KB

ACUTEC

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size236.3 KB
1/3
20i Security Features
0/3
ACUTEC Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.