GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

esAbansysvsAcenses

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Abansys
WPTR ScoreWinner1207 ms
Rank#503
TTFB921ms
Time to 1MB337ms
Score1207
LCP1321ms
FCP1121ms
Acens
WPTR Score1331 ms
Rank#441
TTFB1083ms
Time to 1MB165ms
Score1331
LCP1483ms
FCP1283ms

Our Verdict

Abansys wins with 921ms TTFB (vs Acens's 1083ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAbansysAcensWinner
DNS Lookup4ms347msAbansys
TCP Connection146ms4msAcens
TLS Handshake123ms9msAcens
Server Processing125ms575msAbansys
Total TTFB398ms935msAbansys

Technology & Security Features

Abansys

Server/CDNnginx/1.16.1
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size34.5 KB

Acens

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size93.5 KB
0/3
Abansys Security Features
2/3
Acens Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.