GitHub|Since 2007

esAbansysvsAtresHostes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1207 ms
Rank#503
TTFB921ms
Time to 1MB337ms
Score1207
LCP1321ms
FCP1121ms
WPTR ScoreWinner497 ms
Rank#14
TTFB93ms
Time to 1MB103ms
Score497
LCP493ms
FCP293ms

Our Verdict

AtresHost wins with 93ms TTFB (vs Abansys's 921ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAbansysAtresHostWinner
DNS Lookup4ms63msAbansys
TCP Connection146ms13msAtresHost
TLS Handshake123ms18msAtresHost
Server Processing125ms156msAbansys
Total TTFB398ms250msAtresHost

Technology & Security Features

Abansys

Server/CDNnginx/1.16.1
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size34.5 KB

AtresHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size278.7 KB
0/3
Abansys Security Features
2/3
AtresHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.