GitHub|Since 2007

esAbansysvsAxarnetes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1207 ms
Rank#503
TTFB921ms
Time to 1MB337ms
Score1207
LCP1321ms
FCP1121ms
WPTR Score3349 ms
Rank#715
TTFB901ms
Time to 1MB913ms
Score3349
LCP1301ms
FCP1101ms

Our Verdict

Axarnet wins with 901ms TTFB (vs Abansys's 921ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAbansysAxarnetWinner
DNS Lookup4ms254msAbansys
TCP Connection146ms413msAbansys
TLS Handshake123ms148msAbansys
Server Processing125ms343msAbansys
Total TTFB398ms1158msAxarnet

Technology & Security Features

Abansys

Server/CDNnginx/1.16.1
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size34.5 KB

Axarnet

Server/CDNPHP/8.3.8
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size145.5 KB
0/3
Abansys Security Features
1/3
Axarnet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.