AbansysvsFactoría Digital
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/26/2026

Abansys
View Details →
Factoría Digital
View Details →Our Verdict
Factoría Digital wins with 1236ms TTFB (vs Abansys's 1874ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Abansys | Factoría Digital | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 4ms | 206ms | Abansys |
| TCP Connection | 66ms | 126ms | Abansys |
| TLS Handshake | 327ms | 59ms | Factoría Digital |
| Server Processing | 123ms | 67ms | Factoría Digital |
| Total TTFB | 520ms | 458ms | Factoría Digital |
Technology & Security Features
Abansys
Factoría Digital
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.