GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

esAbansysvsNicaliaes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Abansys
WPTR ScoreWinner1207 ms
Rank#503
TTFB921ms
Time to 1MB337ms
Score1207
LCP1321ms
FCP1121ms
Nicalia
WPTR Score2113 ms
Rank#619
TTFB576ms
Time to 1MB744ms
Score2113
LCP976ms
FCP776ms

Our Verdict

Nicalia wins with 576ms TTFB (vs Abansys's 921ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAbansysNicaliaWinner
DNS Lookup4ms189msAbansys
TCP Connection146ms46msNicalia
TLS Handshake123ms45msNicalia
Server Processing125ms47msNicalia
Total TTFB398ms327msNicalia

Technology & Security Features

Abansys

Server/CDNnginx/1.16.1
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size34.5 KB

Nicalia

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size168.0 KB
0/3
Abansys Security Features
1/3
Nicalia Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.