GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

JPABLENETvsWadaxJP

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

ABLENET
WPTR Score3822 ms
Rank#394
TTFB782ms
Time to 1MB244ms
Score3822
LCP1182ms
FCP982ms
Wadax
WPTR ScoreWinner1287 ms
Rank#94
TTFB88ms
Time to 1MB182ms
Score1287
LCP488ms
FCP288ms

Our Verdict

Wadax wins with 88ms TTFB (vs ABLENET's 782ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseABLENETWadaxWinner
DNS Lookup2063ms114msWadax
TCP Connection644ms8msWadax
TLS Handshake270ms7msWadax
Server Processing259ms721msABLENET
Total TTFB3236ms850msWadax

Technology & Security Features

ABLENET

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size42.5 KB

Wadax

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size83.4 KB
1/3
ABLENET Security Features
1/3
Wadax Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.