GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

esAcensvsGinernetes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Acens
WPTR ScoreWinner1331 ms
Rank#441
TTFB1083ms
Time to 1MB165ms
Score1331
LCP1483ms
FCP1283ms
Ginernet
WPTR Score2747 ms
Rank#694
TTFB330ms
Time to 1MB978ms
Score2747
LCP730ms
FCP530ms

Our Verdict

Ginernet wins with 330ms TTFB (vs Acens's 1083ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAcensGinernetWinner
DNS Lookup347ms109msGinernet
TCP Connection4ms179msAcens
TLS Handshake9ms59msAcens
Server Processing575ms53msGinernet
Total TTFB935ms400msGinernet

Technology & Security Features

Acens

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size93.5 KB

Ginernet

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size101.4 KB
2/3
Acens Security Features
3/3
Ginernet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.