GitHub|Since 2007

esAcensvsIndedmediaes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner1331 ms
Rank#441
TTFB1083ms
Time to 1MB165ms
Score1331
LCP1483ms
FCP1283ms
WPTR Score2170 ms
Rank#569
TTFB447ms
Time to 1MB669ms
Score2170
LCP847ms
FCP647ms

Our Verdict

Indedmedia wins with 447ms TTFB (vs Acens's 1083ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAcensIndedmediaWinner
DNS Lookup347ms212msIndedmedia
TCP Connection4ms203msAcens
TLS Handshake9ms76msAcens
Server Processing575ms73msIndedmedia
Total TTFB935ms564msIndedmedia

Technology & Security Features

Acens

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size93.5 KB

Indedmedia

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size165.5 KB
2/3
Acens Security Features
3/3
Indedmedia Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.