GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBACUTECvsConoscoGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

ACUTEC
WPTR Score1076 ms
Rank#307
TTFB491ms
Time to 1MB262ms
Score1076
LCP891ms
FCP691ms
Conosco
WPTR ScoreWinner747 ms
Rank#157
TTFB168ms
Time to 1MB224ms
Score747
LCP568ms
FCP368ms

Our Verdict

Conosco wins with 168ms TTFB (vs ACUTEC's 491ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseACUTECConoscoWinner
DNS Lookup141ms93msConosco
TCP Connection90ms8msConosco
TLS Handshake56ms12msConosco
Server Processing160ms96msConosco
Total TTFB447ms209msConosco

Technology & Security Features

ACUTEC

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size236.3 KB

Conosco

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size250.5 KB
0/3
ACUTEC Security Features
3/3
Conosco Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.