GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBACUTECvsNetitudeGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

ACUTEC
WPTR Score1076 ms
Rank#307
TTFB491ms
Time to 1MB262ms
Score1076
LCP891ms
FCP691ms
Netitude
WPTR ScoreWinner533 ms
Rank#29
TTFB90ms
Time to 1MB115ms
Score533
LCP490ms
FCP290ms

Our Verdict

Netitude wins with 90ms TTFB (vs ACUTEC's 491ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseACUTECNetitudeWinner
DNS Lookup141ms116msNetitude
TCP Connection90ms4msNetitude
TLS Handshake56ms9msNetitude
Server Processing160ms128msNetitude
Total TTFB447ms257msNetitude

Technology & Security Features

ACUTEC

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size236.3 KB

Netitude

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size207.5 KB
0/3
ACUTEC Security Features
3/3
Netitude Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.