GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBAcuutechvsHTGGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Acuutech
WPTR Score3136 ms
Rank#509
TTFB347ms
Time to 1MB623ms
Score3136
LCP747ms
FCP547ms
HTG
WPTR ScoreWinner578 ms
Rank#72
TTFB142ms
Time to 1MB140ms
Score578
LCP542ms
FCP342ms

Our Verdict

HTG wins with 142ms TTFB (vs Acuutech's 347ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAcuutechHTGWinner
DNS Lookup1304ms148msHTG
TCP Connection220ms5msHTG
TLS Handshake56ms9msHTG
Server Processing61ms80msAcuutech
Total TTFB1641ms242msHTG

Technology & Security Features

Acuutech

Server/CDNApache/2.4.58 (Ubunt
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size247.6 KB

HTG

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size109.6 KB
1/3
Acuutech Security Features
3/3
HTG Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.