GitHub|Since 2007

AUAirTrunkvsVentraIPAU

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2434 ms
Rank#659
TTFB491ms
Time to 1MB882ms
Score2434
LCP891ms
FCP691ms
WPTR Score5937 ms
Rank#818
TTFB2092ms
Time to 1MB1532ms
Score5937
LCP2492ms
FCP2292ms

Our Verdict

AirTrunk wins with 491ms TTFB (vs VentraIP's 2092ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAirTrunkVentraIPWinner
DNS Lookup106ms868msAirTrunk
TCP Connection123ms489msAirTrunk
TLS Handshake45ms600msAirTrunk
Server Processing43ms303msAirTrunk
Total TTFB317ms2260msAirTrunk

Technology & Security Features

AirTrunk

Server/CDNSucuri/Cloudproxy
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size88.3 KB

VentraIP

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size241.6 KB
2/3
AirTrunk Security Features
2/3
VentraIP Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.