Alastyrvsİsimtescil
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Alastyr
View Details →
İsimtescil
View Details →Our Verdict
Alastyr wins with 150ms TTFB (vs İsimtescil's 546ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Alastyr | İsimtescil | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 4ms | 107ms | Alastyr |
| TCP Connection | 15ms | 108ms | Alastyr |
| TLS Handshake | 14ms | 40ms | Alastyr |
| Server Processing | 67ms | 384ms | Alastyr |
| Total TTFB | 100ms | 639ms | Alastyr |
Technology & Security Features
Alastyr
İsimtescil
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.