GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

trAlastyrvsKriwebtr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Alastyr
WPTR Score542 ms
Rank#125
TTFB150ms
Time to 1MB184ms
Score542
LCP550ms
FCP350ms
Kriweb
WPTR ScoreWinner486 ms
Rank#41
TTFB62ms
Time to 1MB140ms
Score486
LCP462ms
FCP262ms

Our Verdict

Kriweb wins with 62ms TTFB (vs Alastyr's 150ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAlastyrKriwebWinner
DNS Lookup4ms44msAlastyr
TCP Connection15ms56msAlastyr
TLS Handshake14ms9msKriweb
Server Processing67ms41msKriweb
Total TTFB100ms150msKriweb

Technology & Security Features

Alastyr

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size139.3 KB

Kriweb

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size109.0 KB
3/3
Alastyr Security Features
0/3
Kriweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.