GitHub|Since 2007

mxAldeaHostvsBioxnetmx

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score7496 ms
Rank#815
TTFB431ms
Time to 1MB2297ms
Score7496
LCP831ms
FCP631ms
WPTR ScoreWinner911 ms
Rank#98
TTFB257ms
Time to 1MB110ms
Score911
LCP657ms
FCP457ms

Our Verdict

Bioxnet wins with 257ms TTFB (vs AldeaHost's 431ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAldeaHostBioxnetWinner
DNS Lookup854ms64msBioxnet
TCP Connection841ms13msBioxnet
TLS Handshake145ms17msBioxnet
Server Processing143ms553msAldeaHost
Total TTFB1983ms647msBioxnet

Technology & Security Features

AldeaHost

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size105.4 KB

Bioxnet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size282.0 KB
2/3
AldeaHost Security Features
2/3
Bioxnet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.