GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

mxAldeaHostvsNeuboxmx

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

AldeaHost
WPTR Score9307 ms
Rank#832
TTFB636ms
Time to 1MB2344ms
Score9307
LCP1036ms
FCP836ms
Neubox
WPTR ScoreWinner2544 ms
Rank#683
TTFB63ms
Time to 1MB1038ms
Score2544
LCP463ms
FCP263ms

Our Verdict

Neubox wins with 63ms TTFB (vs AldeaHost's 636ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAldeaHostNeuboxWinner
DNS Lookup873ms6msNeubox
TCP Connection839ms11msNeubox
TLS Handshake145ms14msNeubox
Server Processing1824ms22msNeubox
Total TTFB3681ms53msNeubox

Technology & Security Features

AldeaHost

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size105.4 KB

Neubox

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size8.9 KB
2/3
AldeaHost Security Features
3/3
Neubox Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.