GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

atAlwyzonvsEasynameat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Alwyzon
WPTR ScoreWinner892 ms
Rank#310
TTFB306ms
Time to 1MB313ms
Score892
LCP706ms
FCP506ms
Easyname
WPTR Score1923 ms
Rank#601
TTFB657ms
Time to 1MB662ms
Score1923
LCP1057ms
FCP857ms

Our Verdict

Alwyzon wins with 306ms TTFB (vs Easyname's 657ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAlwyzonEasynameWinner
DNS Lookup1ms90msAlwyzon
TCP Connection31ms89msAlwyzon
TLS Handshake46ms85msAlwyzon
Server Processing63ms70msAlwyzon
Total TTFB141ms334msAlwyzon

Technology & Security Features

Alwyzon

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size40.7 KB

Easyname

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size153.8 KB
1/3
Alwyzon Security Features
1/3
Easyname Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.