GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

atAnexiavsWorld4Youat

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Anexia
WPTR ScoreWinner763 ms
Rank#271
TTFB408ms
Time to 1MB227ms
Score763
LCP808ms
FCP608ms
World4You
WPTR Score1015 ms
Rank#339
TTFB588ms
Time to 1MB224ms
Score1015
LCP988ms
FCP788ms

Our Verdict

Anexia wins with 408ms TTFB (vs World4You's 588ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAnexiaWorld4YouWinner
DNS Lookup1ms55msAnexia
TCP Connection55ms52msWorld4You
TLS Handshake58ms50msWorld4You
Server Processing104ms320msAnexia
Total TTFB218ms477msAnexia

Technology & Security Features

Anexia

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size59.7 KB

World4You

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size59.8 KB
1/3
Anexia Security Features
2/3
World4You Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.