AntagonistvsTrue
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Antagonist
View Details →
True
View Details →Our Verdict
Antagonist wins with 225ms TTFB (vs True's 730ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Antagonist | True | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 106ms | 207ms | Antagonist |
| TCP Connection | 47ms | 275ms | Antagonist |
| TLS Handshake | 61ms | 64ms | Antagonist |
| Server Processing | 88ms | 173ms | Antagonist |
| Total TTFB | 302ms | 719ms | Antagonist |
Technology & Security Features
Antagonist
True
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.