GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBARO TechnologyvsRazorblueGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

ARO Technology

ARO Technology

View Details →
WPTR ScoreWinner862 ms
Rank#189
TTFB417ms
Time to 1MB158ms
Score862
LCP817ms
FCP617ms
Razorblue
WPTR Score1902 ms
Rank#317
TTFB359ms
Time to 1MB327ms
Score1902
LCP759ms
FCP559ms

Our Verdict

Razorblue wins with 359ms TTFB (vs ARO Technology's 417ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseARO TechnologyRazorblueWinner
DNS Lookup115ms224msARO Technology
TCP Connection176ms41msRazorblue
TLS Handshake129ms74msRazorblue
Server Processing63ms778msARO Technology
Total TTFB483ms1117msRazorblue

Technology & Security Features

ARO Technology

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size143.4 KB

Razorblue

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size218.9 KB
1/3
ARO Technology Security Features
1/3
Razorblue Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.