ARO TechnologyvsWP Engine UK
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

ARO Technology
View Details →
WP Engine UK
View Details →Our Verdict
ARO Technology wins with 417ms TTFB (vs WP Engine UK's 832ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | ARO Technology | WP Engine UK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 115ms | 6ms | WP Engine UK |
| TCP Connection | 176ms | 8ms | WP Engine UK |
| TLS Handshake | 129ms | 12ms | WP Engine UK |
| Server Processing | 63ms | 737ms | ARO Technology |
| Total TTFB | 483ms | 763ms | ARO Technology |
Technology & Security Features
ARO Technology
WP Engine UK
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.