GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

esArsysvsGinernetes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Arsys
WPTR ScoreWinner1768 ms
Rank#492
TTFB696ms
Time to 1MB415ms
Score1768
LCP1096ms
FCP896ms
Ginernet
WPTR Score2747 ms
Rank#694
TTFB330ms
Time to 1MB978ms
Score2747
LCP730ms
FCP530ms

Our Verdict

Ginernet wins with 330ms TTFB (vs Arsys's 696ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseArsysGinernetWinner
DNS Lookup106ms109msArsys
TCP Connection257ms179msGinernet
TLS Handshake276ms59msGinernet
Server Processing133ms53msGinernet
Total TTFB772ms400msGinernet

Technology & Security Features

Arsys

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size468.5 KB

Ginernet

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size101.4 KB
1/3
Arsys Security Features
3/3
Ginernet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.