Aruba S.p.AvsCriticalCase
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Aruba S.p.A
View Details →
CriticalCase
View Details →Our Verdict
Aruba S.p.A wins with 229ms TTFB (vs CriticalCase's 3280ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Aruba S.p.A | CriticalCase | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 2ms | 74ms | Aruba S.p.A |
| TCP Connection | 16ms | 88ms | Aruba S.p.A |
| TLS Handshake | 20ms | 53ms | Aruba S.p.A |
| Server Processing | 64ms | 1795ms | Aruba S.p.A |
| Total TTFB | 102ms | 2010ms | Aruba S.p.A |
Technology & Security Features
Aruba S.p.A
CriticalCase
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.