GitHub|Since 2007

ITAruba S.p.AvsWeb Hosting Canada (WHC)CA

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/11/2026

Aruba S.p.A

Aruba S.p.A

View Details
WPTR ScoreWinner725 ms
Rank#124
TTFB211ms
Time to 1MB214ms
Score725
LCP611ms
FCP411ms
Web Hosting Canada (WHC)

Web Hosting Canada (WHC)

View Details
WPTR Score1032 ms
Rank#284
TTFB449ms
Time to 1MB243ms
Score1032
LCP849ms
FCP649ms

Our Verdict

Aruba S.p.A wins with 211ms TTFB (vs Web Hosting Canada (WHC)'s 449ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.