GitHub|Since 2007

krAsadalvsDothomekr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score29630 ms
Rank#909
TTFB2034ms
Time to 1MB11836ms
Score29630
LCP2434ms
FCP2234ms
WPTR ScoreWinner26625 ms
Rank#905
TTFB2163ms
Time to 1MB10334ms
Score26625
LCP2563ms
FCP2363ms

Our Verdict

Asadal wins with 2034ms TTFB (vs Dothome's 2163ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAsadalDothomeWinner
DNS Lookup4ms296msAsadal
TCP Connection553ms608msAsadal
TLS Handshake0ms309msAsadal
Server Processing667ms610msDothome
Total TTFB1224ms1823msAsadal

Technology & Security Features

Asadal

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size180.4 KB

Dothome

Server/CDNnginx/1.20.1
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size101.9 KB
0/3
Asadal Security Features
0/3
Dothome Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.