GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

krAsadalvsiWinVkr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Asadal
WPTR Score29630 ms
Rank#909
TTFB2034ms
Time to 1MB11836ms
Score29630
LCP2434ms
FCP2234ms
iWinV
WPTR ScoreWinner13870 ms
Rank#882
TTFB3119ms
Time to 1MB4928ms
Score13870
LCP3519ms
FCP3319ms

Our Verdict

Asadal wins with 2034ms TTFB (vs iWinV's 3119ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAsadaliWinVWinner
DNS Lookup4ms626msAsadal
TCP Connection553ms550msiWinV
TLS Handshake0ms253msAsadal
Server Processing667ms614msiWinV
Total TTFB1224ms2043msAsadal

Technology & Security Features

Asadal

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size180.4 KB

iWinV

Server/CDNApache/2.4.62 (Rocky
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size67.5 KB
0/3
Asadal Security Features
0/3
iWinV Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.