GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

krAsadalvsMireenekr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Asadal
WPTR ScoreWinner29630 ms
Rank#909
TTFB2034ms
Time to 1MB11836ms
Score29630
LCP2434ms
FCP2234ms
Mireene
WPTR Score46755 ms
Rank#915
TTFB3435ms
Time to 1MB18904ms
Score46755
LCP3835ms
FCP3635ms

Our Verdict

Asadal wins with 2034ms TTFB (vs Mireene's 3435ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAsadalMireeneWinner
DNS Lookup4ms292msAsadal
TCP Connection553ms264msMireene
TLS Handshake0ms543msAsadal
Server Processing667ms286msMireene
Total TTFB1224ms1385msAsadal

Technology & Security Features

Asadal

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size180.4 KB

Mireene

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size243.9 KB
0/3
Asadal Security Features
0/3
Mireene Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.