GitHub|Since 2007

esAtresHostvsLucusHostes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner497 ms
Rank#14
TTFB93ms
Time to 1MB103ms
Score497
LCP493ms
FCP293ms
WPTR Score1573 ms
Rank#462
TTFB316ms
Time to 1MB520ms
Score1573
LCP716ms
FCP516ms

Our Verdict

AtresHost wins with 93ms TTFB (vs LucusHost's 316ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAtresHostLucusHostWinner
DNS Lookup63ms78msAtresHost
TCP Connection13ms141msAtresHost
TLS Handshake18ms55msAtresHost
Server Processing156ms51msLucusHost
Total TTFB250ms325msAtresHost

Technology & Security Features

AtresHost

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size278.7 KB

LucusHost

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size24.2 KB
2/3
AtresHost Security Features
3/3
LucusHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.