GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plAttHostvsCyberfolkspl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

AttHost
WPTR ScoreWinner592 ms
Rank#113
TTFB246ms
Time to 1MB131ms
Score592
LCP646ms
FCP446ms
Cyberfolks
WPTR Score2394 ms
Rank#616
TTFB480ms
Time to 1MB774ms
Score2394
LCP880ms
FCP680ms

Our Verdict

AttHost wins with 246ms TTFB (vs Cyberfolks's 480ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAttHostCyberfolksWinner
DNS Lookup26ms44msAttHost
TCP Connection46ms96msAttHost
TLS Handshake49ms62msAttHost
Server Processing157ms334msAttHost
Total TTFB278ms536msAttHost

Technology & Security Features

AttHost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size93.3 KB

Cyberfolks

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size202.7 KB
0/3
AttHost Security Features
2/3
Cyberfolks Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.