GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plAttHostvsJCHostpl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

AttHost
WPTR ScoreWinner592 ms
Rank#113
TTFB246ms
Time to 1MB131ms
Score592
LCP646ms
FCP446ms
JCHost
WPTR Score983 ms
Rank#170
TTFB234ms
Time to 1MB196ms
Score983
LCP634ms
FCP434ms

Our Verdict

JCHost wins with 234ms TTFB (vs AttHost's 246ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAttHostJCHostWinner
DNS Lookup26ms133msAttHost
TCP Connection46ms222msAttHost
TLS Handshake49ms67msAttHost
Server Processing157ms91msJCHost
Total TTFB278ms513msJCHost

Technology & Security Features

AttHost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size93.3 KB

JCHost

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size77.7 KB
0/3
AttHost Security Features
2/3
JCHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.