GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

plAttHostvsProgresopl

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

AttHost
WPTR ScoreWinner592 ms
Rank#113
TTFB246ms
Time to 1MB131ms
Score592
LCP646ms
FCP446ms
Progreso
WPTR Score705 ms
Rank#144
TTFB387ms
Time to 1MB105ms
Score705
LCP787ms
FCP587ms

Our Verdict

AttHost wins with 246ms TTFB (vs Progreso's 387ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAttHostProgresoWinner
DNS Lookup26ms66msAttHost
TCP Connection46ms125msAttHost
TLS Handshake49ms123msAttHost
Server Processing157ms139msProgreso
Total TTFB278ms453msAttHost

Technology & Security Features

AttHost

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size93.3 KB

Progreso

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size164.0 KB
0/3
AttHost Security Features
0/3
Progreso Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.