GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

huATWvsNethelyhu

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

ATW
WPTR Score4509 ms
Rank#779
TTFB283ms
Time to 1MB1739ms
Score4509
LCP683ms
FCP483ms
Nethely
WPTR ScoreWinner1651 ms
Rank#431
TTFB242ms
Time to 1MB508ms
Score1651
LCP642ms
FCP442ms

Our Verdict

Nethely wins with 242ms TTFB (vs ATW's 283ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseATWNethelyWinner
DNS Lookup49ms57msATW
TCP Connection100ms273msATW
TLS Handshake112ms69msNethely
Server Processing74ms33msNethely
Total TTFB335ms432msNethely

Technology & Security Features

ATW

Server/CDNatw-proxy
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size62.1 KB

Nethely

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size25.2 KB
0/3
ATW Security Features
0/3
Nethely Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.