AxarnetvsGinernet
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Axarnet
View Details →
Ginernet
View Details →Our Verdict
Ginernet wins with 330ms TTFB (vs Axarnet's 901ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Axarnet | Ginernet | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 254ms | 109ms | Ginernet |
| TCP Connection | 413ms | 179ms | Ginernet |
| TLS Handshake | 148ms | 59ms | Ginernet |
| Server Processing | 343ms | 53ms | Ginernet |
| Total TTFB | 1158ms | 400ms | Ginernet |
Technology & Security Features
Axarnet
Ginernet
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.