GitHub|Since 2007

esAxarnetvsSW Hostinges

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score3349 ms
Rank#715
TTFB901ms
Time to 1MB913ms
Score3349
LCP1301ms
FCP1101ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2073 ms
Rank#570
TTFB49ms
Time to 1MB836ms
Score2073
LCP449ms
FCP249ms

Our Verdict

SW Hosting wins with 49ms TTFB (vs Axarnet's 901ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAxarnetSW HostingWinner
DNS Lookup254ms20msSW Hosting
TCP Connection413ms13msSW Hosting
TLS Handshake148ms18msSW Hosting
Server Processing343ms16msSW Hosting
Total TTFB1158ms67msSW Hosting

Technology & Security Features

Axarnet

Server/CDNPHP/8.3.8
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size145.5 KB

SW Hosting

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size5.3 KB
1/3
Axarnet Security Features
2/3
SW Hosting Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.