GitHub|Since 2007

vnAZDIGIvsNhân Hòavn

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2103 ms
Rank#568
TTFB26ms
Time to 1MB836ms
Score2103
LCP426ms
FCP226ms
WPTR Score3436 ms
Rank#695
TTFB872ms
Time to 1MB755ms
Score3436
LCP1272ms
FCP1072ms

Our Verdict

AZDIGI wins with 26ms TTFB (vs Nhân Hòa's 872ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAZDIGINhân HòaWinner
DNS Lookup48ms36msNhân Hòa
TCP Connection19ms15msNhân Hòa
TLS Handshake20ms21msAZDIGI
Server Processing10ms1552msAZDIGI
Total TTFB97ms1624msAZDIGI

Technology & Security Features

AZDIGI

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size5.3 KB

Nhân Hòa

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size348.0 KB
3/3
AZDIGI Security Features
1/3
Nhân Hòa Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.