GitHub|Since 2007

dkAzeHostingvsCuranetdk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score3021 ms
Rank#703
TTFB1838ms
Time to 1MB438ms
Score3021
LCP2238ms
FCP2038ms
WPTR ScoreWinner663 ms
Rank#82
TTFB181ms
Time to 1MB129ms
Score663
LCP581ms
FCP381ms

Our Verdict

Curanet wins with 181ms TTFB (vs AzeHosting's 1838ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseAzeHostingCuranetWinner
DNS Lookup35ms121msAzeHosting
TCP Connection53ms123msAzeHosting
TLS Handshake59ms10msCuranet
Server Processing1823ms99msCuranet
Total TTFB1970ms353msCuranet

Technology & Security Features

AzeHosting

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size448.3 KB

Curanet

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size146.8 KB
3/3
AzeHosting Security Features
3/3
Curanet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.