BacloudvsServeriai.lt
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Bacloud
View Details →
Serveriai.lt
View Details →Our Verdict
Serveriai.lt wins with 448ms TTFB (vs Bacloud's 833ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Bacloud | Serveriai.lt | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 1ms | 134ms | Bacloud |
| TCP Connection | 16ms | 123ms | Bacloud |
| TLS Handshake | 23ms | 75ms | Bacloud |
| Server Processing | 580ms | 65ms | Serveriai.lt |
| Total TTFB | 620ms | 397ms | Serveriai.lt |
Technology & Security Features
Bacloud
Serveriai.lt
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.