GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

seBahnhofvsbeebytese

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Bahnhof
WPTR ScoreWinner1223 ms
Rank#342
TTFB374ms
Time to 1MB320ms
Score1223
LCP774ms
FCP574ms
beebyte
WPTR Score1988 ms
Rank#590
TTFB527ms
Time to 1MB686ms
Score1988
LCP927ms
FCP727ms

Our Verdict

Bahnhof wins with 374ms TTFB (vs beebyte's 527ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBahnhofbeebyteWinner
DNS Lookup75ms85msBahnhof
TCP Connection68ms72msBahnhof
TLS Handshake137ms73msbeebyte
Server Processing175ms112msbeebyte
Total TTFB455ms342msBahnhof

Technology & Security Features

Bahnhof

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size286.0 KB

beebyte

Server/CDNApache/2.4.41 (Ubunt
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size157.2 KB
0/3
Bahnhof Security Features
0/3
beebyte Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.