GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

seBahnhofvsBinerose

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Bahnhof
WPTR ScoreWinner1223 ms
Rank#342
TTFB374ms
Time to 1MB320ms
Score1223
LCP774ms
FCP574ms
Binero
WPTR Score1299 ms
Rank#400
TTFB334ms
Time to 1MB415ms
Score1299
LCP734ms
FCP534ms

Our Verdict

Binero wins with 334ms TTFB (vs Bahnhof's 374ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBahnhofBineroWinner
DNS Lookup75ms109msBahnhof
TCP Connection68ms61msBinero
TLS Handshake137ms68msBinero
Server Processing175ms65msBinero
Total TTFB455ms303msBinero

Technology & Security Features

Bahnhof

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size286.0 KB

Binero

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size361.0 KB
0/3
Bahnhof Security Features
2/3
Binero Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.