GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

seBahnhofvsEgensajtse

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Bahnhof
WPTR ScoreWinner1223 ms
Rank#342
TTFB374ms
Time to 1MB320ms
Score1223
LCP774ms
FCP574ms
Egensajt
WPTR Score1351 ms
Rank#466
TTFB914ms
Time to 1MB274ms
Score1351
LCP1314ms
FCP1114ms

Our Verdict

Bahnhof wins with 374ms TTFB (vs Egensajt's 914ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseBahnhofEgensajtWinner
DNS Lookup75ms143msBahnhof
TCP Connection68ms138msBahnhof
TLS Handshake137ms160msBahnhof
Server Processing175ms252msBahnhof
Total TTFB455ms693msBahnhof

Technology & Security Features

Bahnhof

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size286.0 KB

Egensajt

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.8 KB
0/3
Bahnhof Security Features
1/3
Egensajt Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.