Beanfield MetroconnectvsLong View Systems
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026
Beanfield Metroconnect
View Details →Long View Systems
View Details →Our Verdict
Long View Systems wins with 239ms TTFB (vs Beanfield Metroconnect's 686ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Beanfield Metroconnect | Long View Systems | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 1890ms | 104ms | Long View Systems |
| TCP Connection | 301ms | 8ms | Long View Systems |
| TLS Handshake | 340ms | 8ms | Long View Systems |
| Server Processing | 171ms | 425ms | Beanfield Metroconnect |
| Total TTFB | 2702ms | 545ms | Long View Systems |
Technology & Security Features
Beanfield Metroconnect
Long View Systems
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.