Beanfield MetroconnectvsVexxhost
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026
Beanfield Metroconnect
View Details →Vexxhost
View Details →Our Verdict
Vexxhost wins with 224ms TTFB (vs Beanfield Metroconnect's 603ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Beanfield Metroconnect | Vexxhost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 969ms | 5ms | Vexxhost |
| TCP Connection | 710ms | 14ms | Vexxhost |
| TLS Handshake | 304ms | 19ms | Vexxhost |
| Server Processing | 153ms | 433ms | Beanfield Metroconnect |
| Total TTFB | 2136ms | 471ms | Vexxhost |
Technology & Security Features
Beanfield Metroconnect
Vexxhost
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.