beebytevsMiss Hosting
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

beebyte
View Details →
Miss Hosting
View Details →Our Verdict
Miss Hosting wins with 123ms TTFB (vs beebyte's 527ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | beebyte | Miss Hosting | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 85ms | 6ms | Miss Hosting |
| TCP Connection | 72ms | 11ms | Miss Hosting |
| TLS Handshake | 73ms | 18ms | Miss Hosting |
| Server Processing | 112ms | 279ms | beebyte |
| Total TTFB | 342ms | 314ms | Miss Hosting |
Technology & Security Features
beebyte
Miss Hosting
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.